The Answerability Index · Fortune 100 (pilot) · Industrial machineryReal capture · 2026-05-27

We asked five AI systems for the leading US industrial companies. Only Caterpillar got a unanimous answer.

Where US airlines produced a settled top three, industrial machinery fractures: the five engines overlapped just 0.34 (airlines: 0.64), agreed on the #1 only a third of the time, and filled most of the list with companies that aren't American. This category is molten — the answer hasn't set.

Observed surfacing & cross-engine divergence — US companies5 engines · 6 prompts · 3 runs/engine · captured 2026-05-27
Surfacing rate0%100%· share of the 6 prompts in which the company was surfaced
σ — cross-engine divergence (std. dev. across the 5 engines)

What this page measures

Each row is observed surfacing — how often a company entered the AI-mediated consideration set across a bounded battery of buyer questions — not a ranking. The heatmap maps citation territory: the small set of companies the engines repeatedly surface for each question. The question is not "who is best?" — it is "who appears when the buyer asks?"

Observed surfacing, not endorsement. These pages sit inside the same Content / Retrieval / Trust architecture as the rest of our working papers on AI-mediated buyer discovery.

Category temperature: frozen vs molten

Frozen

The engines have converged on a small canonical set, reinforced by broad corroboration, accumulated entity clarity, and a large shared retrieval surface. On-page changes alone are unlikely to displace the top tier; the work shifts to defending edge cases.

Molten

The answer has not set. Engines disagree run-to-run, adjacent or foreign firms enter the answer set, and retrieval-surface quality decides surfacing. Companies can still claim citation territory with answer-shaped, entity-clear, machine-retrievable content.

Industrial machinery is the calibration example of a molten category (inter-engine overlap 0.34). US airlines is the frozen one (0.64).

How to read this

FROM PROMPT TO CITATION TERRITORY Buyer prompt Five AI systems Companies surfaced Overlap & σ Citation territory Surfacing rate — how often a company appears Overlap — how much the engines agree on the answer set σ divergence — how unevenly the engines treat a given company

Hover or tap any engine cell above to see the real prompts behind that number.

The headline finding Even for prompts that say "US," the engines named a mostly foreign field. Across all five engines, the names recurring most after Caterpillar were Komatsu (Japan), Siemens (Germany), ABB (Switzerland), Schneider Electric (France), Hitachi and FANUC (Japan), Volvo and Sandvik (Sweden), and even XCMG and SANY (China). Only Caterpillar and John Deere reliably anchor the American field. The AI answer to "leading US industrial companies" is, substantially, not American.
The six prompts behind these numbers (US buyer-intent)
  1. What are the leading industrial machinery manufacturers in the US?
  2. Which companies make the best heavy construction equipment?
  3. Best industrial equipment suppliers for large manufacturers?
  4. Which companies lead in factory automation equipment?
  5. Top US industrial and manufacturing companies?
  6. Leading suppliers of industrial machinery for enterprises?

Scope & caveats. Rows show US companies (the index roster); the foreign firms the engines surfaced are reported in the finding above, not charted. This cut covers all five engines (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Grok), web-grounded, with company names canonicalized from auto-extracted output.

Strategic reading: the molten field is winnable

Run the same instrument on industrial machinery and the airlines structure collapses. Overlap falls by nearly half (0.34 vs 0.64), only Caterpillar is a true consensus pick, and the engines disagree run-to-run even with themselves. The answer hasn't set — it's molten.

When no canonical answer exists, the engine improvises from whatever it can retrieve. That is why "leading US industrial companies" fills with Komatsu, Siemens, ABB, and Schneider: the global industrial corpus is far denser than the US-specific one, so the engines appear to retrieve on topical density and quietly drop the "US" qualifier. It is not a fact about who is American — it looks like a retrieval effect you can watch happen in the data.

In a molten category, the lower rungs of the ladder decide who gets named. With corroboration unsaturated, surfacing appears up for grabs — and it goes to whoever is most retrievable (an AI crawler can reach and parse you), most cleanly resolved as an entity, and most answer-shaped for the buyer's question. Those are precisely the things a company controls — and precisely what a diagnostic measures.

Define your content territory before it sets. Because the surface hasn't solidified, the opening is to publish the answers your buyers are actually asking, make them retrievable and entity-clear, and stake a claim while the field is still forming. In a frozen market the retrieval surface is already drawn and defended; in a molten one it is being drawn right now — and whoever maps it first tends to get named when it hardens. Hover any cell above to see the prompts behind each number — the retrieval surface, made legible.

Asked for US leaders, the engines answer globally

US ANCHORS — THE ONLY CONSENSUS Caterpillar John Deere THE FIELD FILLS WITH FIRMS THAT AREN'T AMERICAN Komatsu JP Siemens DE ABB CH Schneider FR Hitachi JP FANUC JP Volvo SE Sandvik SE Asked for US leaders, the engines retrieve the denser global corpus and quietly drop the "US" qualifier — molten territory, drawn from whatever is most retrievable.
Methodology note. A bounded pilot capture: 5 AI systems, 6 buyer-intent prompts, 3 runs per engine, captured 2026-05-27. Rows show observed surfacing of US-roster companies within this prompt battery — not endorsements, quality rankings, or market-share estimates. Foreign firms the engines surfaced are reported in the finding, not charted. Company names were canonicalized from extracted outputs. The Answerability Index · pilot.

Research publication based on sampled AI outputs collected on 2026-05-27. Findings reflect observed outputs in this sample and are not statements of company quality, ranking factors, or business performance.